Score a recording against your rubric
Every finding is timestamped and clickable.
Upload the recording. Give Echosaw your criteria. Click any finding to play the moment it came from.
Drop your files here or browse
Video, audio, or images up to 5GB each · documents (PDF, TXT, MD, PPTX) up to 25MB
Works with your own files — not just YouTube links.
Rewatching from 0:00 is the work. It should not be.
Manual review means scrubbing a recording end to end, keeping the criteria in your head or a spreadsheet, and typing notes into a separate document. When someone asks why a call was scored the way it was, the answer is a timestamp you have to go find again.
Echosaw starts you at the cited timestamp, with the criterion, the adjudication, and the passage that supports it.
One upload. A scored rubric with clickable evidence.
Upload the recording. Give Echosaw your criteria — a rubric document, policy text, or a list of questions. Each finding cites the moment in the source; click it and the clip plays.
Real meeting. Real analysis. Real insights.
Explore a full Echosaw analysis of a recorded meeting: timestamped transcript, key moments, AI insights, generated outputs, and a chat grounded in the video.
- 1. Upload video, audio, images, or documents
- 2. Analyze transcripts, timelines, and key moments
- 3. Ask questions and get cited answers
Output formats:
Calls, sessions, and recorded reviews
Upload a support call, a training session, a moderation queue export, or any recorded review. Echosaw transcribes it with speakers separated, then answers your criteria against the transcript and what is on screen. Every finding links back to the second it happened, and the recording stays searchable in your library alongside everything else you have analyzed.
What a finding looks like
Three criteria from a scored support call. In your report, each timestamp opens the clip.
Finding
- Criterion
- Agent greets the customer and states their name within the first 30 seconds.
- Adjudication
- Criterion Met
- Timestamp
- 00:00:06
- Transcript
- “Thanks for calling, this is Dana. How can I help you today?”
Finding
- Criterion
- Agent confirms the customer's identity before discussing account details.
- Adjudication
- Criterion Unmet
- Timestamp
- 00:02:47
- Transcript
- “Sure, I can see your last three payments here — the most recent one posted on the 14th.”
Finding
- Criterion
- Agent offers a callback when a resolution is not available on the call.
- Adjudication
- Flagged for Review
- Timestamp
- 00:11:32
- Transcript
- “I'll have to look into that. Is there a good number for you?”
Manual review vs. Echosaw
| Manual review | Echosaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Where the reviewer starts | 0:00 every time | The cited timestamp |
| What they get | Notes, memory, a separate doc | Findings that click to the source timestamp |
| Your criteria | In someone's head or a spreadsheet | The rubric you load — as a document, policy text, or questions |
| Private files | Whatever fits in the player | Your files, up to 5GB, not only public links |
| After the decision | Hard to show why | Timestamp + passage + clip |
Ready to bring powerful multimodal AI to your media operations?
Trusted at scale to extract semantic insights, build intelligent timelines, deliver accurate transcripts, analyze audio and visual content, and generate synthetic media — with full control and security. Start with our Starter plan for $9/month — usage-based pricing so you only pay for what you analyze.